<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SA Series Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yorker.wordpress.com/2005/12/03/sa-series-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yorker.wordpress.com/2005/12/03/sa-series-review/</link>
	<description>for all things cricket</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amar</title>
		<link>http://yorker.wordpress.com/2005/12/03/sa-series-review/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yorker.wordpress.com/2005/12/03/sa-series-review/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>The series ended 2-2 but, as you said, it was clear that the Safs played better cricket (even w/o their best spinner and also a world class batsman). Although, I do believe that the visiting side got a number of key decisions in their favor, which helped them win the series. Especially the first game where they could have lost the wkt of Smith w/o a run on the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series ended 2-2 but, as you said, it was clear that the Safs played better cricket (even w/o their best spinner and also a world class batsman). Although, I do believe that the visiting side got a number of key decisions in their favor, which helped them win the series. Especially the first game where they could have lost the wkt of Smith w/o a run on the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
